We know the truth. “Israel,” for a year, has been committing an accelerated genocide of the Palestinian people. Israel now is expanding its genocidal war to Lebanon. “Israel” is a death cult. But death is profitable. The so-called United States of America — a nation fatally empowered by accumulation, exploitation, and conquest — has backed this cadaverous entity to the fullest extent. It is the U.S. government that supplies the missiles raining down on Rafah and Deir al-Balah, incinerating whole families in their tents, turning safe zones into mass graves. It is the U.S. president who signs off on the use of 2,000-pound bombs in the suburbs of Beirut. And it is the U.S. media that endorses and seeks to normalize these unearthly horrors.

In the pages of The New York Times, Zionist massacres are presented as “targeted assassinations,” cold-blooded slaughter is presented as “counter-terrorism,” and ethnic cleansing is presented as “self-defense.” (Massacre, slaughter, and ethnic cleansing are just three of the terms that The Times’s style guide prevents reporters from using to describe the genocidal conditions in which over two million Palestinians exist. Apparently, it is only when Palestinians dare to resist their annihilation that words like slaughter are appropriate.) The so-called ‘paper of record’ is a mouthpiece for empire, amplifying lies and distorting reality in order to shore up America’s psychic and material investments in colonialism and occupation.

Divestment begins with an accounting of what we owe. “I claim responsibility for the Israeli crimes against humanity,” June Jordan wrote in 1982, “because I am an American and American monies made these atrocities possible.”

UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES
“All the Consent That’s Fit to Manufacture”

New York War Crimes

New York War Crimes

Unsubscribe From The New York Times

To unsubscribe from The New York Times, click here. Then, return to this template and use whatever you find helpful in order to write your own email, in more or less your own words, to the editors listed below:

Suzanne Spector, spector@nytimes.com
Philip Pan, philip.pan@nytimes.com
Joseph Kahn, joe.kahn@nytimes.com

If you don’t mind, CC now@wawog.com so that we can know how many people are using the template.


Re: “Screams Without Words”

To the editors directly responsible for the publication of “Screams Without Words,”

This letter is to inform you that I am unsubscribing from The New York Times. I am horrified by the recent news that Jeffrey Gettleman, the reporter you assigned to investigate events of October 7, hired an ex-IDF fixer who applauds the genocide of Palestinians on social media. But I am not surprised. The scandal surrounding the manufacture of “Screams Without Words” is only the latest incident in your newsroom’s decade-long history of journalistic malpractice in its coverage of Occupied Palestine.

I ask that you not only retract “Screams Without Words” in full, but also issue an apology for your consistent failure to cite credible sources, include the perspectives of Palestinians, and name the perpetrator of the violence being unleashed on the people of Gaza.

The problems with the piece, which purports to be about “how Hamas weaponized sexual violence,” precede the news of Anat Schwartz’s Twitter activity. As many media watchdogs have pointed out, the article lacks forensic evidence and relies heavily on sources from the Israeli military, which has been known to propagate lies to justify its brutal violence against Palestinians. The article portrays the Israeli citizen Gal Abdush as a rape victim, despite her family’s public refutation of these claims. (Etti Brakha, Gal Abdush’s mother, revealed in an interview with YNET that the family was first informed about the allegations by a journalist from your publication, not by any official or forensic reports.) Finally, in lieu of testimony from survivors, we hear from ZAKA volunteers. It is hard to imagine a more disreputable source.

A survey of articles on your website indicates that your company hired Anat Schwartz and Adam Sella, two of the article’s authors, after October 7. The former has a background in film and appears to work for an Israel state-run television network. Sella, who appears to be Schwartz’s nephew by marriage, was writing about beer fests for Wine Enthusiast before being conscripted into war reporting. I am deeply perplexed by The Times’ decision to hire two novices to cover the extremely sensitive issue of sexual violence, especially given that the charge of sexual violence has, in this case, become a pretext for the collective punishment of Gaza.

Jeffrey Gettleman is a concerning choice of author for this story. In a 2018 interview with The Times of Israel, he said Arabs and Muslims fail to distinguish between Jews and Israelis — a common Islamophobic trope. In a 2015 piece about Robert Mugabe published, he lifted quotes from a satirical magazine and attributed them to the late Zimbabwean president. In 2019, he interviewed a Rohingya rape survivor, with disastrous results.

It is important to emphasize that issues with the authors of a single Times article should not distract from the wider problem of the organization’s reporting on Palestine. Between its failure to attribute a genocidal bombing campaign to the perpetrator and its regurgitation of the Israeli military’s unsubstantiated claims linking UNRWA to Hamas while Palestinians in North Gaza starve to death, The Times has proven over the past four months, and indeed, over many brutal years of Israeli occupation and siege, to be completely incapable of covering Palestine.

I have no doubt that I am far from the only person who finds themselves in my position. Until The New York Times commits to a comprehensive, top-to-bottom overhaul of its coverage, I will no longer be able to continue to support The Times financially or to trust it as a source of news — about Palestine or anything else.

Yours sincerely,
[signee]